<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2026/08/21/when-compliance-is-not-consent-applying-agni-when-p-is-sedated-and-objecting/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Promoting Open Justice in the Court of Protection</news:name><news:language>en-gb</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-08-21T11:49:04+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>When compliance is not consent: Applying AGNI when P is sedated and objecting</news:title><news:keywords>Mental Capacity, Open Justice, Transparency, Court of Protection, Legal Practice, Best Interests</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://openjusticecourtofprotection.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/screenshot-2026-08-21-at-12.45.44.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
