By Daniel Clark, Eleanor Tallon, and Heather Walton, 24th July 2025 “The case concerns a young autistic man residing in a supported living setting, and proceedings have been ongoing. The real issues between the parties, as I understood them, are in relation to his care and support and whether the current package is appropriate. PerhapsContinue reading ““Perhaps the most contentious matter is the question of his social media and internet access.” But who is the decision-maker?”
Tag Archives: Legal Practice
I’m finally free to say I’m a family member of a P: Does it have to be so hard to change a Transparency Order?
By Amanda Hill, 22nd July 2025 I went to a friend’s 60th birthday party last weekend. Jane has a lot of friends from different walks of life and encouraged us to meet new people. When guests arrived, not only did we have badges with our names on, we were also given a list of twoContinue reading “I’m finally free to say I’m a family member of a P: Does it have to be so hard to change a Transparency Order?”
Navigating engagement in capacity assessment
By Daniel Holt, 2nd July 2025 The case I observed in person before District Judge Clarke sitting at First Avenue House on 9th June 2025 (COP 20015914) was brought by the London Borough of Lewisham (the “LA”) and concerned a deaf adult with a mild learning disability (“P”), who was represented by the Official SolicitorContinue reading “Navigating engagement in capacity assessment”
Strongly held beliefs do not equate to lack of litigation capacity: Judgment concerning Luba Macpherson’s appeal against committal to prison
By Amanda Hill, 24th June 2024 “But in America, in my home, they are persecuting people for using their right to free speech and voicing their dissent. This is happening now.” (Bruce Springsteen, during his concert at Lille, Saturday 24 May 2025[1]) As well as saying people are persecuted for using their right to freeContinue reading “Strongly held beliefs do not equate to lack of litigation capacity: Judgment concerning Luba Macpherson’s appeal against committal to prison”
“Does that mean I am off the hook?”: A successful s21a Deprivation of Liberty Challenge
By Claire Martin, 23rd June 2025 I had some unexpected time on Monday 16th June 2025, so I had a look at the listings the night before, and this one caught my eye because it said ‘FINAL HEARING’, so I knew that the judge’s determination on the matters listed (‘capacity and best interests’) was likelyContinue reading ““Does that mean I am off the hook?”: A successful s21a Deprivation of Liberty Challenge”
Happy fifth birthday to us: Open Justice Court of Protection Project is five years old today
By the Core Team of the Open Justice COP Project (Celia Kitzinger, Gill Loomes-Quinn, Daniel Clark, Amanda Hill and Claire Martin), 15th June 2025 It was launched – with no funding and no clear plan about what we were going to do beyond observing a few hearings and writing some blog posts – on 15th JuneContinue reading “Happy fifth birthday to us: Open Justice Court of Protection Project is five years old today”
Preparing for possible future lack of capacity: My advance decision to refuse treatment and the case before Poole J
By Claire Martin, 13th June 2025 Le soleil ni la mort ne se peuvent regarder en face. You cannot stare straight into the face of the sun, or death. François de La Rochefoucauld, Maxim 26 Over the course of the last year or so, I’ve been thinking about what provisions I want to put inContinue reading “Preparing for possible future lack of capacity: My advance decision to refuse treatment and the case before Poole J”
A judge without a bundle adjourns the case
By Daniel Clark, 11th June 2025 A bundle is a collection of documents that are relevant to the decision that the court is being asked to make. As Kyle Squire, then a barrister at 5 Pump Court Chambers put it in a blog for the Open Justice Court of Protection Project, “‘Bundle’ may be aContinue reading “A judge without a bundle adjourns the case”
Determining the legal status of a ‘Living Will’: Personal reflections on a case before Poole J
By Celia Kitzinger, 5th May 2025 Editorial note: There is a now published judgment, following the later hearing of 22nd and 23rd May) (which will be blogged separately). Click on the link in the name of the case: Re AB (ADRT: Validity and Applicability) [2025] EWCOP 20 (T3) This case (COP 20006397), heard by MrContinue reading “Determining the legal status of a ‘Living Will’: Personal reflections on a case before Poole J”
Reflections on the Supreme Court’s judgment in Abbasi on the duration of reporting restrictions
by Daniel Clark, 25th April 2025 On Wednesday 16th April 2025, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in two cases. One of them, For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers, has received a huge amount of attention in the press and in social media. The other has not. It is nevertheless a veryContinue reading “Reflections on the Supreme Court’s judgment in Abbasi on the duration of reporting restrictions”
Promoting Open Justice in the Court of Protection 