By Claire Martin, 13th June 2025 Le soleil ni la mort ne se peuvent regarder en face. You cannot stare straight into the face of the sun, or death. François de La Rochefoucauld, Maxim 26 Over the course of the last year or so, I’ve been thinking about what provisions I want to put inContinue reading “Preparing for possible future lack of capacity: My advance decision to refuse treatment and the case before Poole J”
Tag Archives: Legal Practice
A judge without a bundle adjourns the case
By Daniel Clark, 11th June 2025 A bundle is a collection of documents that are relevant to the decision that the court is being asked to make. As Kyle Squire, then a barrister at 5 Pump Court Chambers put it in a blog for the Open Justice Court of Protection Project, “‘Bundle’ may be aContinue reading “A judge without a bundle adjourns the case”
Determining the legal status of a ‘Living Will’: Personal reflections on a case before Poole J
By Celia Kitzinger, 5th May 2025 Editorial note: There is a now published judgment, following the later hearing of 22nd and 23rd May) (which will be blogged separately). Click on the link in the name of the case: Re AB (ADRT: Validity and Applicability) [2025] EWCOP 20 (T3) This case (COP 20006397), heard by MrContinue reading “Determining the legal status of a ‘Living Will’: Personal reflections on a case before Poole J”
Reflections on the Supreme Court’s judgment in Abbasi on the duration of reporting restrictions
by Daniel Clark, 25th April 2025 On Wednesday 16th April 2025, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in two cases. One of them, For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers, has received a huge amount of attention in the press and in social media. The other has not. It is nevertheless a veryContinue reading “Reflections on the Supreme Court’s judgment in Abbasi on the duration of reporting restrictions”
Statutory Wills: A barrister explains
By Ruth Hughes KC, 22nd April 2025 Editorial note: We commissioned this blog post due to the interest in statutory wills generated by the case of W v P [2025] EWCOP 11(T3) which was heard in private. The blog author acted for the P in that case, instructed by the Official Solicitor. We have alsoContinue reading “Statutory Wills: A barrister explains”
Transparency in twenty days at Cardiff Court of Protection
By Kim Dodd, 15th April 2025 I was a Litigant in Person in my dad’s Court of Protection case from February 2024 until his death in August 2024. He died in the care home it was deemed to be in his best interests to be forcibly removed to, from his own home – despite hisContinue reading “Transparency in twenty days at Cardiff Court of Protection”
Draconian reporting restrictions (now lifted) in a contempt of court case: Severing continuity between judgments
By Amanda Hill and Claire Martin (with acknowledgment of significant input and support from Celia Kitzinger) Update 26 May 2025: The application to vary the reporting restrictions was successful and a judgment, [2025] EWCOP 16 (T3), was published on the National Archives Friday 23 May 2025. We will blog about the hearing to vary theContinue reading “Draconian reporting restrictions (now lifted) in a contempt of court case: Severing continuity between judgments”
Feeling foolish and frustrated: How I failed to observe an RCJ hearing due to an uncorrected listing error
By Amanda Hill, 23rd March 2025 I was excited to be travelling to London to observe an in-person hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ) as part of my research with Cardiff University. This would be my third time observing in person at the RCJ and I was beginning to feel as though I knewContinue reading “Feeling foolish and frustrated: How I failed to observe an RCJ hearing due to an uncorrected listing error”
Correcting judicial mistakes: HHJ Robertshaw’s transparency order
By Celia Kitzinger, 16th March 2025 Everybody makes mistakes sometimes. Even judges. Some mistakes can be inconsequential: a typo, a bit of grammar that doesn’t make sense, paragraphs wrongly numbered. I’m not complaining about mistakes like that, what someone on X described (in response to my complaints) as “dotting the ‘i’s and crossing the ‘t’s”.Continue reading “Correcting judicial mistakes: HHJ Robertshaw’s transparency order”
Response to the Transparency and Open Justice Board proposed “key objectives”
By Celia Kitzinger, 3rd March 2025 The Transparency and Open Justice Board recently sought views on the Board’s proposed key objectives. The Board was created in April 2024 by the Lady Chief Justice, who said that it would “…set objectives for all Courts and Tribunals, focussing on timely and effective access in terms of listing, documents and publicContinue reading “Response to the Transparency and Open Justice Board proposed “key objectives””
Promoting Open Justice in the Court of Protection 