From Cheshire West to AGNI: Rebalancing Protection, Autonomy and Human Rights

One positive consequence of the AGNI judgment may be that it encourages professionals to refocus on their own responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act. By reducing the number of cases that require formal deprivation of liberty authorisation, there is an opportunity for practitioners to develop greater confidence in undertaking capacity assessments, making best interests decisions and applying the Act in day-to-day practice.

Judge authorises medical treatment and DOLS in hospital

In the end, despite having watched the hearing and heard the oral judgment, I don’t know why this judge made the decision she did about deprivation of liberty in this case – which pretty much defeats the purpose of observing a hearing in the first place.

Declaration of death or serious medical treatment withdrawal?

The key question in this case, which will be back in court on 2nd July 2026, is whether or not a man in his 40s, who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest about a month ago) is now “brain stem dead”. 

Iatrogenic harm and the Court of Protection

Court proceedings can cause unintended harm to the person at the centre of the case (“P”) as well as to P’s family, and to P’s wider support network….

A statement on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Re Gardner (Deceased) (Court of Protection: Disclosure of Position Statements)

By the core team of the Open Justice Court of Protection Project, 9th June 2026 On 21 May 2026, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Re Gardner (Deceased) (Court of Protection: Disclosure of Position Statements [2026] EWCA Civ 640. This was an appeal against the decision of Poole J in Re AB (Disclosure of Position Statements) [2025]Continue reading “A statement on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Re Gardner (Deceased) (Court of Protection: Disclosure of Position Statements)”

Anorexia, declaratory protection and the Mental Health Act: Ventilating a jurisdictional question following Townsend

Given the likelihood of an upcoming Supreme Court hearing, it may be that Townsend provides a very slender thread on which to base the Trust’s argument – or indeed, on which to delay determination of P’s best interests by first detouring down what might turn out to be a jurisdictional cul-de-sac over the next six weeks.

Judge refuses to make Civil Restraint Order against P’s father

By Celia Kitzinger, 30th March 2026 A Court of Protection judge has refused an application from South Tyneside Council to make a Civil Restraint Order (CRO) against the father of a young autistic man living in supported accommodation. I observed the hearing (COP 14075351) before Mr Justice Poole sitting in person in the Royal CourtsContinue reading “Judge refuses to make Civil Restraint Order against P’s father”

“This cannot be allowed to carry on”: A non-compliance hearing with NHS Humber and North Yorkshire ICB

According to the OS, there had been “a disagreement between the parties” about whether or not the court ought to make that order in the first place (the ICB wanted instead to focus only on whether and how improvements could be made to JH’s current home) – so it rather looks as though the ICB has simply failed to comply with an order they don’t like.

Unfair judicial criticism of observers is bad for transparency

I’m not immune from criticism, here. What I thought were my reasonable efforts to get clarity about whether this hearing was going ahead, and then my further attempts to get the link, seem to have created problems for HMCTS staff. Those miscommunications and misunderstandings swirled around a judge who probably didn’t even have time for a cup of tea between hearings. It wasn’t my intention to exacerbate those stresses and, in future, I’ll just send any and all correspondence direct to the hub. That’s what I’ve learnt from this experience. I hope there’s some judicial learning from this experience, too.

What’s the difference between a barrister and a solicitor (and a legal executive)?

By Lucy Reed, 21st January 2026 Barristers, solicitors and legal executives are all lawyers, but they are different types of lawyers. There are many similarities and many differences. One is not ‘better’, more experienced or more senior than the other. They have quite different training and expertise and do different types of legal work. The system thatContinue reading “What’s the difference between a barrister and a solicitor (and a legal executive)?”