“Getting it right first time around”: How members of the public contribute to the judicial “learning experience” about transparency orders

By Celia Kitzinger, 7th June 2024 We operate a “Watch List” at the Open Justice Court of Protection Project.  We do this because the Court of Protection doesn’t always get things right first time around.   Sometimes we find repeated problems with how particular judges’ hearings are listed (e.g. they don’t have descriptors to tell us what they’reContinue reading ““Getting it right first time around”: How members of the public contribute to the judicial “learning experience” about transparency orders”

My experience at Weymouth Combined Court: listing, access, and transparency

By Peter C Bell, 30th May 2024 It was one of those days where I had not really intended to do any Court watching. I was back in Weymouth to help the family to support my elderly father after the recent loss of both his wife (my mother) and then his elder sister and casuallyContinue reading “My experience at Weymouth Combined Court: listing, access, and transparency”

Caesarean: A directions hearing

By Celia Kitzinger, 27th May 2024 The purpose of a  “directions” hearing is for the judge to narrow down the issues that are to be decided, and to give instructions (“directions”) on how the case will proceed.  The point is to sort out procedural and practical matters.  Directions hearings often cover actions that need to be taken (e.g., capacityContinue reading “Caesarean: A directions hearing”

Challenging a Transparency Order prohibiting identification of the Public Guardian as a party

By Celia Kitzinger, 24th May 2024 UPDATE: There was a hearing about this matter on 30th May 2024 at which the prohibition on identifying the Office of the Public Guardian as a party in the case was lifted. It was, said the judge, a “mistake” to have included this prohibition in the Transparency Order. ForContinue reading “Challenging a Transparency Order prohibiting identification of the Public Guardian as a party”

A private hearing before DJ Glassbrook

By Claire Martin, Celia Kitzinger, Peter C Bell and Kim Dodd, 22nd May 2024 A few months ago, we published an audit of “private” hearings – that is, hearings that appear as “private” in the lists on Courtel/CourtServe.  What we found is that at least 50% of those “private” hearings had been wrongly listed as such.  The judgeContinue reading “A private hearing before DJ Glassbrook”

Anorexic woman gets to make her own (incapacitous) decisions, says Hayden J

By Celia Kitzinger, 19 May 2024 “It does not follow that when a judge is satisfied that the presumption of capacity has been rebutted that it is automatically incumbent on the court to take decisions for the protected party…. Sometimes it is in the best interests of the protected party to take decisions for themselves,Continue reading “Anorexic woman gets to make her own (incapacitous) decisions, says Hayden J”

A chaotic start to a hearing – and assessment of Mum as carer ordered

By Amanda Hill, 17 May 2024 “Open justice is a fundamental principle in our courts”. That is the standard line included in many of the court listings. This means that members of the public, like me, can observe hearings. Sometimes, obstacles are put in our way. In this hearing, certain members of the public wereContinue reading “A chaotic start to a hearing – and assessment of Mum as carer ordered”

Centenarian challenges deprivation of liberty – and judge manages transparency failings efficiently

Celia Kitzinger, 16 May 2024 There are more than 500 centenarians in Devon, and she’s one of them.   Until September 2023, she lived at home with her daughter.   Now she’s deprived of her liberty in a care home, where she’s been for around six months, following discharge from hospital after a fall. She wants toContinue reading “Centenarian challenges deprivation of liberty – and judge manages transparency failings efficiently”

Capacity and sexual relationships – an ongoing challenge and some cautionary notes

Ruby Reed-Berendt and Beverley Clough, 13 May 2024 This blog is a summary of a recent article published in the International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, as part of a special issue on mental health and borders. You can read the article in full here.  Peter (not his real name) is nearly 20 years old andContinue reading “Capacity and sexual relationships – an ongoing challenge and some cautionary notes”

 Open justice fails again: This hearing wasn’t publicly listed – then the judge denied us remote access, and never sent the approved order 

By Celia Kitzinger, 12 May 2024 Last week, Mr Justice Nicklin was announced as the chair of the judiciary’s new transparency and open justice board.  He gave a speech welcoming  “a new breed of court reporters” – and the “hugely valuable contribution” made by members of the public who tweet or blog from court. It’s lovely to feel “seen” and valued likeContinue reading ” Open justice fails again: This hearing wasn’t publicly listed – then the judge denied us remote access, and never sent the approved order “