Serving a prison sentence for contempt of court: Luba Macpherson

The Court of Appeal was (again) displaying to others who might be tempted to flout court orders that it would not hesitate to exact punishment.

Commentary on Re YD (Refusal of Withdrawal of Treatment) [2025] EWCOP 31 (T3)

By Jenny Kitzinger, 20th August 2025 A couple of weeks ago I observed a hearing about ‘YD’, a 60-year-old man in a Prolonged Disorder of Consciousness at the lower end of the spectrum (a vegetative state). The Trust had made an application that it was in YD’s best interests to withdraw life-sustaining treatment, specifically clinicallyContinue reading “Commentary on Re YD (Refusal of Withdrawal of Treatment) [2025] EWCOP 31 (T3)”

A patient with “unusual” spiritual beliefs: Is withdrawing a feeding tube in his best interests?

By Jenny Kitzinger, 8th August 2025 12th August 2025: The judgment has just been published (click on the case name): The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v YD & Others (Refusal of Withdrawal of Treatment) [2025] EWCOP 31 (T3). Jenny has written a commentary on the judgment (also covering media reception of it) here: “CommentaryContinue reading “A patient with “unusual” spiritual beliefs: Is withdrawing a feeding tube in his best interests?”

­­­Litigation Capacity, Luba Macpherson and the court’s engagement with a ‘persistent’ litigant

By Claire Martin, 30th July 2025 Luba Macpherson[1] is a woman with strongly held views regarding the care and treatment of her daughter. The Open Justice Court of Protection Project has published several blogs about the case, most recently this blog by Amanda Hill: ‘Strongly held beliefs do not equate to lack of litigation capacity:Continue reading “­­­Litigation Capacity, Luba Macpherson and the court’s engagement with a ‘persistent’ litigant”

Strongly held beliefs do not equate to lack of litigation capacity: Judgment concerning Luba Macpherson’s appeal against committal to prison

By Amanda Hill, 24th June 2024 “But in America, in my home, they are persecuting people for using their right to free speech and voicing their dissent. This is happening now.” (Bruce Springsteen, during his concert at Lille, Saturday 24 May 2025[1]) As well as saying people are persecuted for using their right to freeContinue reading “Strongly held beliefs do not equate to lack of litigation capacity: Judgment concerning Luba Macpherson’s appeal against committal to prison”

Another Irish Schedule 3 case: “An oddity in the Court of Protection”

By Celia Kitzinger, 11th September 2024 She’s an Irish citizen in her early twenties, with schizophrenia and a “mild intellectual disability”, currently detained in an acute unit at an Irish psychiatric hospital under an order of the Irish Court.  It’s not an appropriate placement for her.   Everyone agrees she needs a homely environment where she canContinue reading “Another Irish Schedule 3 case: “An oddity in the Court of Protection””

Directions Hearing for a Life Sustaining Treatment Case

By Hita Jadeja, 14th August 2024 On 31 July 2024 I observed a hearing (COP 20000664) before Mrs Justice Theis sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice.   An NHS Trust (‘the Trust’) has made an application concerning life-sustaining treatment for a middle-aged lady and this was a ‘directions’ hearing. Essentially directions hearings are held to prepareContinue reading “Directions Hearing for a Life Sustaining Treatment Case”

Capacity and sexual relationships – an ongoing challenge and some cautionary notes

Ruby Reed-Berendt and Beverley Clough, 13 May 2024 This blog is a summary of a recent article published in the International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, as part of a special issue on mental health and borders. You can read the article in full here.  Peter (not his real name) is nearly 20 years old andContinue reading “Capacity and sexual relationships – an ongoing challenge and some cautionary notes”

A ‘closed hearing’ to end a ‘closed material’ case

By Celia Kitzinger, 18th December 2023 M is keeping something private from her parents. She doesn’t want them to know what it is.   The lawyers in court all know what it is.  So does the judge.  But observers like me haven’t been told.  And her parents still don’t know.  The court papers shared with them have been heavilyContinue reading “A ‘closed hearing’ to end a ‘closed material’ case”

Another case of s.21A delay (with a happy ending)

By John Harper, 27 October 2023 On Thursday 19 October 2023, I observed a remote hearing (COP 13627234) before Theis J, Vice President of the Court of Protection, sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice. An earlier hearing in the case was blogged here: “A s.21A challenge for a restricted patient: A ‘shocking’ delay”.   TheContinue reading “Another case of s.21A delay (with a happy ending)”