By Daniel Clark, 29 September 2024 This case began as an urgent application to the Court of Protection in August 2023. It wasn’t until May 2024 that it came before a judge. In August 2023, XY (who resides in Turkey) was visiting the UK with her brother, CD. She has done this many times but,Continue reading “Can a Turkish Guardianship Order be recognised in England and Wales? “
Tag Archives: HHJ Hilder
Bromley is outsourcing property and affairs deputyships: Is it lawful?
By Georgina Baidoun, 6th September 2024 At 2pm on 2nd August 2024 I watched a hearing before HHJ Hilder, the Senior Judge of the Court of Protection. Here’s how it was listed: COP 140287761, BJ v London Borough of Bromley “To consider property and affairs deputyship – discharge functions through contractual arrangement”. Noting that this wasContinue reading “Bromley is outsourcing property and affairs deputyships: Is it lawful?”
When families want to tell their story: Discharging a transparency order
By Celia Kitzinger (Intervenor) and “Anna” (Amanda Hill) (Observer), 27 February 2024 Update: The judgment is available here: The judgment is available here: In the Matter of VS (deceased) [2024] EWCOP 6 Back in 2014, Mr Justice Munby, then President of the Court of Protection, expressed concern that the court was “saddled … with theContinue reading “When families want to tell their story: Discharging a transparency order”
Inaudible in-person proceedings: A practical barrier to transparency and open justice
By Tim Sugden, 21st February 2024 It’s not open justice if you can’t hear what is being said in the courtroom. My experience is that this is a recurrent problem in magistrates’ courts – and now I’ve found the same problem in the Court of Protection as well. My experiences in magistrates’ courts with CourtwatchContinue reading “Inaudible in-person proceedings: A practical barrier to transparency and open justice”
Judge concerned about “restraint regime” for learning-disabled man prohibits naming public body
By Celia Kitzinger, 29th October 2023 This is yet another case where a judge has signed off on reporting restrictions that prevent the naming of a public body, for reasons that are wholly unclear to me. Neither counsel nor the judge has – to my knowledge – suggested that identification of the local authority involvedContinue reading “Judge concerned about “restraint regime” for learning-disabled man prohibits naming public body”
Observing a remote hearing in court with the judge
This turned out to be a salutary opportunity for me to experience a “judge’s eye view” of a remote hearing. I can now better appreciate the somewhat isolating and disjointed experience it creates for the decision-maker sitting in the nearly empty courtroom.
