By Amanda Hill, 9th May 2024 The protected party in this case (“L”) is a man in his twenties with “significant learning disability”, autism and complex physical disabilities. He had been living at home with a care package in place until July 2021, when his care package broke down and he was moved to a newContinue reading “Crisis point – is hospital a viable option for P?”
Tag Archives: Not Secret Court
A day in the Court of Appeal
By Cliodhna Carroll, 8th May 2024 Editor’s note: You too can watch this hearing – it’s recorded and available on YouTube here: https://www.judiciary.uk/live-hearings/re-a-by-her-litigation-friend-the-official-solicitor/ On 30th April 2024, having cancelled my day due to a bad cold and looking like Rudolph the reindeer, I reached for my iPad to find something to entertain me and remembered thatContinue reading “A day in the Court of Appeal”
“Substantial disagreement” about whether P should return home
By Daniel Clark, 6 May 2024 Mrs F has a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and has been detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 on a number of occasions. She is currently residing in a mental health hospital. She is medically fit for discharge and subject to a standard authorisation under the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. TheContinue reading ““Substantial disagreement” about whether P should return home “
Final considerations for a s21a challenge: Questions about truth-telling to someone with dementia and, yet again, issues with the Transparency Order
By Daniel Clark, 2nd May 2024 Mrs B has a diagnosis of dementia and has lived in a care home for over a year. She does not want to live in a care home; she wants to return home and can see no reason why she can’t. However, her home has been sold and sheContinue reading “Final considerations for a s21a challenge: Questions about truth-telling to someone with dementia and, yet again, issues with the Transparency Order”
“For now, it’s a ‘no'”: Court considers access to Grand Theft Auto
By Gill Loomes-Quinn, 28 April 2024 Grand Theft Auto – a series of action-adventure games – was at the centre of this hearing. The protected party (C ) doesn’t want restrictions on his liberty to play the video games – but is (his carers say) “unable to cope with the emotional impact” of them. Gaming “leadsContinue reading ““For now, it’s a ‘no’”: Court considers access to Grand Theft Auto”
When P’s best interests aren’t in a Council’s financial interests
by Daniel Clark, 21st April 2024 The court has previously found that it is in the best interests of Mr B to remain in his current care home. However, unless he obtains Continuing Healthcare funding, he will have to move because the local authority aren’t able to meet the high cost of the care home. ToContinue reading “When P’s best interests aren’t in a Council’s financial interests”
A contested capacity hearing
By Nell Robson and Claire Martin, 19 April 2024 We observed a hearing (COP 14181752) in Derby before District Judge Lubega on the 12th April 2024. It was listed like this on CourtServe: My (Nell’s) interest in this hearing was piqued because I am a sixth form student currently completing an EPQ (Extended Project Qualification) aboutContinue reading “A contested capacity hearing”
“A most distinguished man”
By Claire Martin, 15th April 2024 A hearing before HHJ Beckley on 18th March 2024 (COP 1347207T) started off with counsel for P (Alison Harvey) describing the person at the centre of the case as “a most distinguished man’”. He is used to living in Kensington & Chelsea and wants to go back there to live. Continue reading ““A most distinguished man” “
Extraordinary restrictions – “family are the experts”
By Celia Kitzinger, 14th April 2024 In an earlier blog post (“Unusual restrictions” for a 17-year-old), Claire Martin reported feeling “very alarmed” by restrictions to which this young man is subject, in self-contained padded rooms, behind a locked door, with 4:1 supervision. The judge in that hearing, DJ Glassbrook, had said these were “extraordinary restrictions which requireContinue reading “Extraordinary restrictions – “family are the experts””
Two hats: Mother as Rule 1.2 representative and (now) litigation friend
By Celia Kitzinger, 11 April 2024 This was a short hearing about a long-running case[1] concerning a man in his twenties (MA) who has a learning disability and autism. Following an unpublished judgment by Hayden J back in July 2021, MA lives at a placement where he is deprived of his liberty. In July 2022, the localContinue reading “Two hats: Mother as Rule 1.2 representative and (now) litigation friend”
Promoting Open Justice in the Court of Protection 