By Celia Kitzinger, 29th August 2025 Earlier this month, Sandra and Joe Preston published an account of their experience in the Court of Protection and queried whether the case about their relative’s “deprivation of liberty” was a good use of judicial time, tax-payers’ money and in the public interest. You can read their blog postContinue reading “Making it possible for families to tell their Court of Protection stories: How we got the reporting restrictions changed (while P is still alive)”
Tag Archives: s.21A
My first experience of being an in-person observer at First Avenue House (London): HHJ Beckley decides on where P should live and receive care
By Sandra Preston, 18 August 2025 On 13 August 2025 I went to First Avenue House (the London headquarters of the Court of Protection) for the first time as an observer – rather than as the relative of a Protected Party (as described my blog post here). I had chosen to do so to gainContinue reading “My first experience of being an in-person observer at First Avenue House (London): HHJ Beckley decides on where P should live and receive care”
“Does that mean I am off the hook?”: A successful s21a Deprivation of Liberty Challenge
By Claire Martin, 23rd June 2025 I had some unexpected time on Monday 16th June 2025, so I had a look at the listings the night before, and this one caught my eye because it said ‘FINAL HEARING’, so I knew that the judge’s determination on the matters listed (‘capacity and best interests’) was likelyContinue reading ““Does that mean I am off the hook?”: A successful s21a Deprivation of Liberty Challenge”
Dispute about capacity and best interests in a s.21A application
By Daniel Clark, 31st January 2025 Mr H has lived in A Care Home since 2022. He is challenging his deprivation of liberty, pursuant to s21a of the Mental Capacity Act 2005[i], but the respondent local authority think that it is not in his best interests to return home. A brief (25 minutes) hearing in this caseContinue reading “Dispute about capacity and best interests in a s.21A application”
Final considerations for a s21a challenge: Questions about truth-telling to someone with dementia and, yet again, issues with the Transparency Order
By Daniel Clark, 2nd May 2024 Mrs B has a diagnosis of dementia and has lived in a care home for over a year. She does not want to live in a care home; she wants to return home and can see no reason why she can’t. However, her home has been sold and sheContinue reading “Final considerations for a s21a challenge: Questions about truth-telling to someone with dementia and, yet again, issues with the Transparency Order”
A s.21A challenge for a ‘restricted’ patient: A “shocking” delay
By Febienne Green (with Celia Kitzinger), 8th August 2023 On Wednesday, 5th July 2023, I watched a hearing (COP 13627234) before Mrs Justice Theis, Vice President of the Court of Protection, sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice via MS Teams. The case was a s.21A challenge to a standard authorisation depriving Mr N of hisContinue reading “A s.21A challenge for a ‘restricted’ patient: A “shocking” delay”
A ‘bog standard’ s.21A case: Amanda’s (‘Anna’s) Mum
By Celia Kitzinger, 5 June 2023 Update April 2025: Following a successful application to vary the Transparency Order, the name ‘Anna’ can now be retired and Amanda Hill can speak in her own name. Her bio is at the bottom of this blog. In recognition of the many months when Amanda had to remain as Anna,Continue reading “A ‘bog standard’ s.21A case: Amanda’s (‘Anna’s) Mum”
‘Deprived of her liberty’: My experience of the court procedure for my mum
I am sharing these thoughts in the hope that it might help other families in similar situations – and I’m writing also for the legal professionals involved in what is, for them, probably routine work, to help them understand more about what it feels like for a family member.
Access to the community for P: a s.21A deprivation of liberty hearing
Judge Eldergill stated that P had mentioned wanting to be able to go to a restaurant (and there was also some mention of P being able to go to a bank). He referred to Paragraph X (of the Position Statement) which stated that the Home was concerned about P going out alone because he was at risk of absconding. However, the judge raised a point about the seemingly low likely risk of this happening, given that at another paragraph, it stated that P uses a Zimmer frame and so clearly has mobility issues.
Can P return to Ireland?
Four potential care homes in the county to which Mrs H wishes to move “very clearly came back and said they could not meet her needs” (Counsel for Mrs H). “Actually”, he added, “she’s an extremely likeable, cheerful, happy, chirpy lady”. Moreover, “her wish to return to Ireland hasn’t waned in any shape or form”.
Promoting Open Justice in the Court of Protection 