My first experience of being an in-person observer at First Avenue House (London): HHJ Beckley decides on where P should live and receive care

By Sandra Preston, 18 August 2025 On 13 August 2025 I went to First Avenue House (the London headquarters of the Court of Protection)  for the first time as an observer – rather than as the relative of a Protected Party (as described my blog post here).  I had chosen to do so to gainContinue reading “My first experience of being an in-person observer at First Avenue House (London): HHJ Beckley decides on where P should live and receive care”

“Does that mean I am off the hook?”: A successful s21a Deprivation of Liberty Challenge

By Claire Martin, 23rd June 2025 I had some unexpected time on Monday 16th June 2025, so I had a look at the listings the night before, and this one caught my eye because it said ‘FINAL HEARING’, so I knew that the judge’s determination on the matters listed (‘capacity and best interests’) was likelyContinue reading ““Does that mean I am off the hook?”: A successful s21a Deprivation of Liberty Challenge”

‘Refusing to engage’: A first hearing

By Celia Kitzinger, 11th June 2023 Cases in the Court of Protection often run for years – especially in the county courts, which is means the majority of all hearings. So we often find ourselves watching a third, or a sixth, or an eighth hearing in a single case, without having observed any of theContinue reading “‘Refusing to engage’: A first hearing”

Pettifogging? Judge invites Office of the Public Guardian to reconsider application to revoke LPA

By Claire Martin, 2 June 2023 This was an application from the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) for a declaration that P’s (purported) appointment of his wife and son as LPA and replacement LPA, respectively, for Property and Finance, was either not valid (because P lacked capacity to make the LPA) or should be revokedContinue reading “Pettifogging? Judge invites Office of the Public Guardian to reconsider application to revoke LPA”

Opaque justice in the Court of Protection: A dispute about the validity of Lasting Power of Attorney

By Daniel Clark, 21st April 2023 At 2pm on Friday 14th April 2023, I observed a directions hearing (COP 13795316) via MS Teams before Deputy District Judge Chahal sitting at First Avenue House in London. I simply couldn’t follow it. Wittgenstein’s notion of language-games proposes that language only has meaning when applied in its context. In other words, it is action thatContinue reading “Opaque justice in the Court of Protection: A dispute about the validity of Lasting Power of Attorney”

On not allowing the strong views of family members to prevail: A COVID-19 hearing

“Strongly held views by well-meaning and concerned family members should be taken into account but never permitted to prevail nor allowed to create avoidable delay. To do so would be to expose the vulnerable to the levels of risk I have identified, in the face of what remains an insidious and highly dangerous pandemic virus“ (Hayden J §26, SD v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2021] EWCOP 14)

The elephant in the courtroom: Clinically assisted nutrition and hydration in a hearing about care and residence

By Celia Kitzinger, 23rd August 2021 I’m profoundly disturbed by this case (COP 12913981) before District Judge Beckley, which has been slowly progressing though the Court of Protection for more than two years[1].  It represents a missed opportunity for the court to engage with a vulnerable person’s best interests in a holistic way.  I want toContinue reading “The elephant in the courtroom: Clinically assisted nutrition and hydration in a hearing about care and residence”