A rock and a hard place: Abortion decision for an incapacitous and conflicted P

By Celia Kitzinger, 10th March 2024 The judgment has now been published and is available here: Rotherham and Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust v NR & Anor [2024] EWCOP 17 The 35-year-old woman (NR) at the centre of this case (COP 14216100) is 22 weeks pregnant, and currently detained under s.3 of the Mental HealthContinue reading “A rock and a hard place: Abortion decision for an incapacitous and conflicted P”

Life-Sustaining Treatment applications:  Hayden J confirms guidance in Re EUP

By Hita Jadeja, 7th March 2024 I am a solicitor with a background in commercial dispute resolution and inhouse advisory work.  I have developed a strong interest in the field of health and social care law, mental capacity and mental health law.   My background in litigation is useful, but health and social care law, mental capacityContinue reading “Life-Sustaining Treatment applications:  Hayden J confirms guidance in Re EUP”

A tribute to E: How anorexia and ‘Re E’ made me a Court of Protection lawyer

By Anonymous COP Lawyer, 3rd March 2024 (with commentary from barrister Pippa Pudney – keep scrolling down) In a recent blog post, Dr Ty Glover described his experiences working with anorexia nervosa patients, including ‘E’, whose prominent Court of Protection case in 2012 resulted in involuntary treatment being found to be in her best interests. ThisContinue reading “A tribute to E: How anorexia and ‘Re E’ made me a Court of Protection lawyer”

Inaudible in-person proceedings: A practical barrier to transparency and open justice

By Tim Sugden, 21st February 2024 It’s not open justice if you can’t hear what is being said in the courtroom.   My experience is that this is a recurrent problem in magistrates’ courts – and now I’ve found the same problem in the Court of Protection as well. My experiences in magistrates’ courts with CourtwatchContinue reading “Inaudible in-person proceedings: A practical barrier to transparency and open justice”

“Private” Hearings: An Audit

By Celia Kitzinger, 1 February 2024 The vast majority of hearings in the Court of Protection are open to the public – but almost every day there are also hearings listed as “PRIVATE”.  My decision to take a closer look at “PRIVATE” hearings was made one Autumn day last year when I checked the listingsContinue reading ““Private” Hearings: An Audit”

Judge approves P’s conveyance (against his wishes) to a care home – and tells lawyers to “just stop!” routinely anonymising public bodies in draft Transparency Orders

by Daniel Clark, 22nd January 2024 It is not unusual for the Court of Protection to hear cases in which a “conveyance plan” needs to be approved. These are plans about how a protected party (P) will move from A to B and are an integral part of keeping P safe while also promoting her orContinue reading “Judge approves P’s conveyance (against his wishes) to a care home – and tells lawyers to “just stop!” routinely anonymising public bodies in draft Transparency Orders”

“An awful state”: Self-neglect and mental capacity

By Ian Brownhill, 17 January 2024 The description of a person being found in “an awful state” is one of the most common phrases than an adult social care lawyer will read. It is a description that has no legal meaning but is often a sanitised portrayal of someone who has been subject to significantContinue reading ““An awful state”: Self-neglect and mental capacity”

Can a judge discharge a Deputy without determination of wrong-doing? Statutory interpretation in action

By Celia Kitzinger, 12th January 2024 UPDATE: The mother/Deputy in this case appealed against the decision to a more senior judge (Mrs Justice Theis, Vice President of the Court of Protection). She lost the appeal. The reasons are set out in this judgment: CL v Swansea Bay University Health Board & Ors I chose toContinue reading “Can a judge discharge a Deputy without determination of wrong-doing? Statutory interpretation in action”

A ‘closed hearing’ to end a ‘closed material’ case

By Celia Kitzinger, 18th December 2023 M is keeping something private from her parents. She doesn’t want them to know what it is.   The lawyers in court all know what it is.  So does the judge.  But observers like me haven’t been told.  And her parents still don’t know.  The court papers shared with them have been heavilyContinue reading “A ‘closed hearing’ to end a ‘closed material’ case”

Mastectomy against her wishes, family concerns and a Trust penalised for delay

By Celia Kitzinger, 11 December 2023 The woman at the centre of this case (GH) is 52 years old. She’s was diagnosed with breast cancer back in March 2023,  but she doesn’t believe she has breast cancer and is refusing all treatment for it. She has a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. I missed the beginning of the hearing,Continue reading “Mastectomy against her wishes, family concerns and a Trust penalised for delay”