This is an account of why and how journalists’ reports of hearings are typically so different from the pieces written by bloggers for projects like the Open Justice Court of Protection Project.
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Secure Accommodation for Young People: “A well-known scandal”
This was a case in which the judge and all the parties to the case (including the local authority) were doing their utmost to help a vulnerable young person against the backdrop of a nationwide shortage of appropriate provision.
Lasting Power of Attorney: Across Borders
My interest in LPAs, and the reason I became a Lasting Power of Attorney Consultant, stems from a long career as a nurse in palliative and end of life care, where I witnessed the impact of not having these important documents in place. I feel incredibly passionate about people’s voices; their choices and their values being heard – and LPAs are an important way of enabling this. I advocate for proactive Advance Care Planning and LPAs are one important element of planning ahead.
Capacity (and sexual relations) in the Supreme Court: Reflections on A Local Authority v JB
JB is a 38-year-old autistic man with impaired cognition. He has expressed a strong desire to have a girlfriend and engage in sexual relations with women, but the local authority has concerns that he does not understand that the other person has to consent to the sexual activity.
What is a section 49 report?
explanation) to a “section 49 report”. They may ask the judge to order one, or talk about a report they’ve received.
Congratulations, Kirsty!
“…Kirsty works tirelessly across a range of issues relating to Disability and Carers’ Rights…”
When an academic theory becomes reality: The applicability of section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 versus section 5 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
By Jennifer O’Neill, 3rd August 2021 On 27th July 2021 I observed a remote hearing (via Microsoft Teams) brought before Mr Justice Hayden in the Court of Protection: COP 1354439T Re: PH. Having observed my first remote hearing in the Court of Protection a few weeks earlier (Re AH COP 13783897), I was aware that when observing such hearings,Continue reading “When an academic theory becomes reality: The applicability of section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 versus section 5 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005”
Court considers how to operate against patient’s will
By Daniel Cloake, 2nd August 2021 This report concerns a case (COP 12132507 In the Matter of “AB” ) before The Hon. Mr Justice Hayden sitting remotely on 20 July 2021. The subject matter of the hearing was presented like this in the Transparency Order: This application is listed for hearing at 10.30 am onContinue reading “Court considers how to operate against patient’s will”
Life-sustaining treatment contrary to his best interests: Lessons from a supplementary hearing
By Jenny Kitzinger, 30 July 2021 The hearing I attended at the Court of Protection on 15th July 2021 (Case No. 1375980T before Mr Justice Hayden) was unusual in that it was described by the judge as a “supplementary hearing”. I’d not come across this type of hearing before, so was interested in the format and processContinue reading “Life-sustaining treatment contrary to his best interests: Lessons from a supplementary hearing”
Capacity for Litigation, Residence and Care: Hunger-Striker (WA) back in court
t today was: given the poor state of WA’s health (due to his hunger strike) where he should be cared for? Should he remain with his parents at their home with appropriate home carers and respite care, or should he move into a specialist residential care home.
Promoting Open Justice in the Court of Protection 