By Rebecca Pritchard, 2nd June 2025 I have observed a number of Court of Protection hearings but have never blogged one before. I chose to blog about this case (COP 14265088 heard by Lieven J on 6th May 2025 in the Royal Courts of Justice, observed via MS Teams), because firstly, it struck me asContinue reading “Risk aversion and delay: Losing sight of best interests?”
Tag Archives: Deprivation of Liberty
Elucidating the meaning of deprivation of liberty orders: HHJ Burrows and local authority at cross-purposes on DOLS and care plans
By Celia Kitzinger, 10th October 2024 Update: The judgment has now been published (click on the link in the title of the case): Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v EM & Ors [2024] EWCOP 76 (T2). The judge refers to the protected party as “Emma” in that judgment, so I’ve amended this blog to reflect that.Continue reading “Elucidating the meaning of deprivation of liberty orders: HHJ Burrows and local authority at cross-purposes on DOLS and care plans”
Crisis point – is hospital a viable option for P?
By Amanda Hill, 9th May 2024 The protected party in this case (“L”) is a man in his twenties with “significant learning disability”, autism and complex physical disabilities. He had been living at home with a care package in place until July 2021, when his care package broke down and he was moved to a newContinue reading “Crisis point – is hospital a viable option for P?”
“ I want to go home” – catching up with GNK 13 months later for the final hearing
By Celia Kitzinger, 27th March 2024 More than a year ago, back in November 2022, assistant psychologist Catalia Griffiths watched and then blogged about a (remote) hearing before Deputy District Judge Reeder concerning a woman in her 50s who was in hospital with Huntington’s disease. The title of the blog post she wrote, reflects whatContinue reading ““ I want to go home” – catching up with GNK 13 months later for the final hearing”
Judge declines to authorise a deprivation of liberty (for now)
by Daniel Clark, 11th March 2024 While Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) in a care home or hospital have little judicial oversight (unless someone appeals or the restrictions are particularly severe), a deprivation of liberty in the community is reviewed by a judge. These are often decided on the papers, in a streamlined procedure knownContinue reading “Judge declines to authorise a deprivation of liberty (for now)”
“Unusual restrictions” for a 17-year-old
By Claire Martin, 25th January 2023 This hearing (COP 14169995 before DJ Glassbrook, sitting at Northampton County Court on 5th January 2024) caught my eye in the CourtServe list because it mentioned “unusual restrictions to which the protected party is subject”. Unfortunately, despite requesting them, I’ve not been sent the parties’ position statements, so I don’t haveContinue reading ““Unusual restrictions” for a 17-year-old”
Back to square one in a complex case
By Daniel Clark, 14 November 2023 “At the moment I have no practical or viable options before me for the safe care and treatment of AB”. So said Mr Justice Keehan towards the end of this hearing, summing up the dire situation that the Court finds itself in. This case (COP 12953545) has a long history, someContinue reading “Back to square one in a complex case”
Observing a Failed Re X hearing: “it sounds like ‘Cassie’ is being unlawfully deprived by contact restrictions”
By Eleanor Tallon, 31st October 2023 My previous blog post on ‘Failed Re X’ described the legal meaning of the term, and the processes whereby these cases get to court. This blog post follows up on that by reporting on a ‘Failed Re X’ hearing (COP 13266959) I observed on 9th October 2023 before District Judge Hart, sittingContinue reading “Observing a Failed Re X hearing: “it sounds like ‘Cassie’ is being unlawfully deprived by contact restrictions””
‘Failed Re X’: Deprivation of liberty and Re X (the streamlined process) – a social work perspective
By Eleanor Tallon, 10th October 2023 The words “Failed Re X” has appeared in Court of Protection lists recently – like the two reproduced below. ‘Re X’ is the term used to refer to the streamlined process through which the Court of Protection (CoP) can authorise a ‘Deprivation of Liberty’ (DoL), as established in theContinue reading “‘Failed Re X’: Deprivation of liberty and Re X (the streamlined process) – a social work perspective”
A s.21A challenge for a ‘restricted’ patient: A “shocking” delay
By Febienne Green (with Celia Kitzinger), 8th August 2023 On Wednesday, 5th July 2023, I watched a hearing (COP 13627234) before Mrs Justice Theis, Vice President of the Court of Protection, sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice via MS Teams. The case was a s.21A challenge to a standard authorisation depriving Mr N of hisContinue reading “A s.21A challenge for a ‘restricted’ patient: A “shocking” delay”
Promoting Open Justice in the Court of Protection 