By Deborah Airey, Amanda Hill (Anna), Jordan Briggs, Nikki Bowsley, Febienne Green, John Harper, Daisy Long, Gill Loomes-Quinn, Claire Martin and Tom McBride (co-ordinated and curated with an introduction by Celia Kitzinger), 18 October 2023 Note: This blog post was ready to publish on 24 July 2023 but publication has been delayed until today because weContinue reading “Tampering with equipment or failings in care? A fact-finding hearing (Part 1)”
Tag Archives: Not Secret Court
‘Failed Re X’: Deprivation of liberty and Re X (the streamlined process) – a social work perspective
By Eleanor Tallon, 10th October 2023 The words “Failed Re X” has appeared in Court of Protection lists recently – like the two reproduced below. ‘Re X’ is the term used to refer to the streamlined process through which the Court of Protection (CoP) can authorise a ‘Deprivation of Liberty’ (DoL), as established in theContinue reading “‘Failed Re X’: Deprivation of liberty and Re X (the streamlined process) – a social work perspective”
Mental Capacity, Disability, and ‘Voice’: A Socio-Legal Exploration
By Gill Loomes-Quinn, 4th October 2023 Editorial Note: Many congratulations to Gill Loomes-Quinn, co-director of the Open Justice Court of Protection Project, who successfully defended her PhD thesis “Mental Capacity, Disability and ‘Voice’: A socio-legal exploration” at her viva (oral examination) on Monday 2nd October 2023. Her PhD research was supervised by Anna Lawson andContinue reading “Mental Capacity, Disability, and ‘Voice’: A Socio-Legal Exploration “
Her day in court: Attorney fights to clear her name in the face of accusations from her brother and the Public Guardian
By Georgina Baidoun, 2nd October 2023 The hearing I observed (COP 13977140, listed for 12 noon on 18 September 2023 before HHJ Spinks sitting in Cambridge County Court) was a “final” hearing to last for two days, with the issue before the court being “Discharge/conduct of deputy or attorney, application by Public Guardian”. Committing toContinue reading “Her day in court: Attorney fights to clear her name in the face of accusations from her brother and the Public Guardian”
Who cares for P? “Pragmatic harmony” finally breaks out in court
By Hartej Singh Saund-Matharu, 19 September 2023 In my first observation of a Court of Protection (CoP) hearing – and first blog – I will take you through who I am and my interest in the Court of Protection, the background of the case my experience of the hearing, and my analysis/reflections of the outcomeContinue reading “Who cares for P? “Pragmatic harmony” finally breaks out in court”
Man on children’s ward due to no suitable placement
By Ahmed Hussain, 19 September 2023 This case concerns a young man who has recently turned 18. He is currently present on a paediatric ward despite having been ready for discharge back in August (about three weeks ago). This situation has arisen due to the lack of suitable placement options. Furthermore, he cannot live withContinue reading “Man on children’s ward due to no suitable placement”
Anxious scrutiny or boilerplate? Evidence on Transparency Orders
By Celia Kitzinger, 15 September 2023 Introduction: On 21st October 2022, I submitted (at the request of counsel and with the permission of the court) a witness statement to Mrs Justice Lieven, concerning Case no. COP 13180943). I was asked to supply evidence as to how, according to my observations, Transparency Orders are actually workingContinue reading “Anxious scrutiny or boilerplate? Evidence on Transparency Orders”
Moving towards transition from children’s to adult services
By Claire Martin, 14 September 2023 John (not his real name) is 17 and will be 18 in three months’ time. He used to live with his adoptive mother but (since 2021) has been living in a Gateshead Local Authority placement where he is supervised 2:1 by carers. I didn’t find out anything about John’sContinue reading “Moving towards transition from children’s to adult services”
How we get there: Conveyance plans in the Court of Protection
By Ian Brownhill, 13 September 2023 The focus of many Court of Protection cases is where someone will live, what care and support they will receive, or what medical treatment they should be provided. Once that substantive decision has been made, the Court’s attention will often turn to what is described as “conveyance planning”. AContinue reading “How we get there: Conveyance plans in the Court of Protection”
Evidence for Ministry of Justice Consultation on “Open Justice: The way forward”
By Celia Kitzinger, 10 September 2023 Drawing on my experience with the Open Justice Court of Protection Project – and with some helpful input from other core team members – I submitted my views about open justice to the Ministry of Justice consultation, just before the deadline at 11.59 on 7th September 2023. I’ve reproducedContinue reading “Evidence for Ministry of Justice Consultation on “Open Justice: The way forward””
Promoting Open Justice in the Court of Protection 